Films & Entertainment

posted by admin on Aug 4

In the latest hearing of ‘University of London’ vs. Mehta as well as many more in the year of 2007 where the claimant was a physician who had opted for the training regarding the medical practice on 9th July 2005. The application was given to the ‘second respondent’, a governing institution within the ‘University of London’.

On 7th September the claimant got a piece of writing from the governing institution of University of London. That piece of writing stated that his application regarding the medical practice was not acceptable. The claimant then stated that he enquired back on the 9th November for the exhaustive response as to why he was rejected to go in for the training in the University of London. The result was that Mr. Mehta did not receive any reply and the worst part was their denial on the fact that they received any letter about he enquiry from him.

The claimant’s enquiry letter sent to the University of London was sent to the ‘Employment Tribunal’ on 10th February 2006 where he alleged victimization and discrimination. After the presentation of the case by the entertainment industry films on 17th February about the dismissal of the case by the ‘Employment Tribunal’ on the grounds of application of the case after three months, the National Association of Attorneys General also added to it that the case would proceed further only if it had strong grounds. Finally on research work it was found that University of London was guilty and Mr. Mehta was given full rights to complete his training there.